| 阮玉山,刘佳,彭志,等.经皮椎间孔镜治疗不同年龄段腰椎间盘突出症的短期疗效对比.骨科,2021,12(4): 306-310. |
| 经皮椎间孔镜治疗不同年龄段腰椎间盘突出症的短期疗效对比 |
| Comparison of Short-term Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation in Different Age Patients |
| 投稿时间：2020-08-23 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-8573.2021.04.003 |
| 中文关键词: 经皮椎间孔镜间盘切除术 腰椎间盘突出症 年龄 疗效 |
| 英文关键词: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy Lumbar disc herniation Age Efficacy |
| 基金项目:云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目（2020J0592） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3976 |
| 全文下载次数: 3582 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 分析比较经皮椎间孔镜间盘切除术（percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy，PELD）治疗不同年龄段腰椎间盘突出症（lumbar disc herniation，LDH）的短期疗效。方法 2018年1月至8月，前瞻性纳入需行PELD治疗的107例LDH病人，以年龄为依据分组，年龄＜45岁的51例纳入青壮年组，年龄≥45岁的56例纳入中老年组。术前1 d、术后1个月、1年和2年随访时采用疼痛视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale，VAS）、Oswestry功能障碍指数（Oswestry disability index，ODI）和改良MacNab标准评估治疗效果，并统计复发率。结果 两组病人均顺利完成手术。两组术后1个月、1年、2年的腰、腿痛VAS评分和腰椎ODI均较术前明显改善，差异均有统计学意义（P均＜0.05）。两组间术后2年的腰、腿痛VAS评分以及术后1年、2年的ODI比较，差异均有统计学意义（P均＜0.05）。青壮年组和中老年组的复发率（1.96% vs. 8.93%）比较，差异无统计学意义（P=0.209）。根据改良MacNab标准，青壮年组和中老年组的优良率分别为96.08%、91.07%。结论 PELD创伤小、疗效好，可作为青壮年病人手术治疗LDH的优选方案，同时康复快、麻醉风险小，也是中老年病人的一个可靠选择。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To compare the short-term efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in different age patients. Methods From January 2018 to August 2018, 107 patients with LDH who underwent PELD treatment were included in this prospective study. A total of 51 patients with age less than 45 years old were included in the young group, and 56 cases with age ≥45 years old were included in the elderly group. Surgical outcomes were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria at 1st day before operation, 1st month, 1st year and 2nd year after operation, and the recurrence rate was statistically analyzed. Results All patients were successfully operated. The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain and the ODI in the two groups at 1st month, 1st year and 2nd year after operation were significantly improved as compared with those before operation (P＜0.05). The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain at 2nd year after operation and ODI at 1st year and 2nd year after operation were compared between the two groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the young group (1.96%) and the elderly group (8.93%) (P=0.209). According to the modified MacNab standard, the excellent and good rates of young group and elderly group were 96.08% and 91.07%, respectively. Conclusion PELD should be the priority selection for surgical treatment of LDH in young patients, because of its mild trauma and excellent efficacy, at the same time, with the rapid recovery and low risk of anesthesia, it can also be a reliable choice for elderly patients. |
|
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
