文章摘要
陈明,赵劲民,程浩,等.可视化四象限三级关节突成形法在经椎间孔入路内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的应用.骨科,2020,11(4): 304-310.
可视化四象限三级关节突成形法在经椎间孔入路内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的应用
Application of visual lateral four-quadrant three-stage facet plasty in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with endoscopic decompression through intervertebral foramen approach
投稿时间:2020-01-18  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8573.2020.04.007
中文关键词: 腰椎  椎管狭窄  可视化  4象限  3级椎间孔成型
英文关键词: Lumbar vertebrae  Spinal stenosis  Visualization  4 Quadrants  Three grade facet joint plasty
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
陈明 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
赵劲民 广西医科大学第一附属医院骨科南宁 530021 651530536@qq.com 
程浩 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院骨科武汉 430030  
廖晖 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院骨科武汉 430030  
赵志刚 武汉市骨科医院武汉 430024  
郑勇 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
张莹 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
叶茂 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
鲁力 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
胡洁 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
刘海洋 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
徐勇峰 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
李晚林 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
黄国最 湖北咸宁和济骨科医院/湖北科技学院临床学院湖北咸宁 437100  
摘要点击次数: 3553
全文下载次数: 3443
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨可视化四象限三级关节突成形法(lateral four quadrants three grade facet joint plasty, LQTP)在经椎间孔入路内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的应用。方法 前瞻性纳入2018年3月至2019年3月拟行经皮内镜下椎管减压术的55例病人,计算机随机分为两组,28例采用可视化LQTP技术作关节突成形,纳入LQTP组;27例采用标准TESSYS(transforaminal endoscopic spine system)技术行环锯椎间孔成形,纳入TESSYS组。按计划随访,并行影像学检查;比较两组病人的术中透视次数、出血量、手术时间、住院时间;比较两组术后1个月、3个月、末次随访时测定的疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index, ODI)及术后并发症发生情况;末次随访时以改良MacNab标准评估临床疗效。结果 LQTP组和TESSYS组的随访时间分别为(11.8±2.6)个月、(12.5±3.5)个月。两组均无椎间盘炎、血肿形成、切口及椎间隙感染、神经根损伤等严重并发症。LQTP组的透视次数、手术时间明显少于TESSYS组,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);两组术后1个月、术后3个月和末次随访时的腰腿痛VAS和ODI均较术前显著改善,与术前相比,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);但两组间同时间点的指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。末次随访时,根据改良MacNab标准,LQTP组优26例,可2例,优良率为92.86%(26/28);TESSYS组优16例,良6例,可5例,优良率为81.48%(22/27);两组优良率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=54.321,P<0.001)。结论 可视化侧路LQTP技术配合椎管内减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症安全、有效,与经典TESSYS技术比较,具有操作简化、切骨准确、手术时间短、放射暴露少的优点。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the application of visual lateral four quadrants three grade facet joint plasty (LQTP) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with endoscopic decompression through intervertebral foramina. Methods From March 2018 to March 2019, 55 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic spinal decompression were collected prospectively. The patients were randomly divided into two groups by computer. Twenty-eight patients undergoing visual LQTP technology for arthroplasty were included in the LQTP group; 27 patients subject to standard transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technology to perform circular saw intervertebral foraminoplasty were included in the TESSYS group. The patients were followed up as planned, given imaging examination. The fluoroscopy times, bleeding volume, operation time, and hospitalization time between the two groups were compared. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and postoperative complications measured at 1st month, 3rd month, and the last follow-up between the two groups were compared. At the last follow-up, the clinical efficacy was evaluated by the modified MacNab standard. Results The follow-up time in LQTP group and TESSYS group was (11.8±2.6) months and (12.5±3.5) months respectively. There were no severe complications such as intervertebral disc inflammation, hematoma formation, incision and intervertebral space infection, and nerve root injury in both groups. The frequency of fluoroscopy and operation time in the LQTP group were significantly reduced as compared with those in the TESSYS group (P<0.05). The VAS scores and ODI of lumbar and leg pain at 1st month, 3rd month and the last follow-up in the two groups were significantly improved as compared with those before the operation, and (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the index comparison between the two groups at the same time (all P>0.05). At the last follow-up, according to the modified MacNab criteria, the LQTP group was excellent in 26 cases, fair in 2 cases, and the excellent rate was 92.86% (26/28); the TESSYS group was excellent in 16 cases, good in 6 cases, fair in 5 cases, and the excellent rate was 81.48% (22/27). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=54.321, P<0.001). Conclusion It is safe and effective to treat lumbar stenosis by visual LQTP combined with decompression. Compared with the classic TESSYS technology, the visual LQTP combined with decompression has the advantages of simpler surgical procedures, more accurate osteotomy, shorter operation time and less radiation exposure.
查看全文   下载PDF阅读器
关闭