文章摘要
戴传强,肖尧,李跃辉,等.同期和分期手术在全髋关节置换术中的治疗效果比较.骨科,2017,8(2): 117-120.
同期和分期手术在全髋关节置换术中的治疗效果比较
Comparison of the effects of the simultaneous surgery vs. staged surgery in total hip replacement
投稿时间:2016-07-08  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8573.2017.02.009
中文关键词: 同期  分期  全髋关节置换术
英文关键词: Simultaneous  Staging  Total hip replacement
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
戴传强 641300 四川资阳资阳市第一人民医院骨科 59490003@qq.com 
肖尧 610041 成都四川省医疗卫生技术咨询所《实用妇产科杂志》编辑部  
李跃辉 641300 四川资阳资阳市第一人民医院骨科  
梁刚 641300 四川资阳资阳市第一人民医院骨科  
钟晓 641300 四川资阳资阳市第一人民医院骨科  
摘要点击次数: 4632
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 比较同期和分期手术在全髋关节置换术的治疗效果,以期为全髋关节置换术式的选择提供依据。方法 回顾性分析资阳市第一人民医院于2009年10月至2015年6月行双侧全髋关节置换术163例病人的临床资料。按照治疗的不同选择分为同期髋关节置换术组(同期组,103例)、分期髋关节置换术组(分期组,60例)。比较两组病人手术时间、出血量、术中输血量、住院费用、住院时间、手术前后Harris评分及术后并发症等情况。结果 同期组病人的平均手术时间为(171.5±1.2) min,平均出血量为(1 231.2±3.1) ml,平均术中输血量为(1 056.1±7.5) ml,并发症发生率为14.56%(15/103),手术前Harris评分为(23.3±1.0)分、术后为(87.9±2.5)分;分期组病人的平均手术时间为(191.8±2.3) min,平均出血量为(1 372.3±4.8) ml,平均术中输血量为(978.9±6.5) ml,并发症发生率为23.33%(14/60),手术前Harris评分为(24.8±3.9)分、术后为(84.1±3.6)分。两组病例以上指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。但是同期组病人住院费用为(3.9±0.6)万元、住院时间为(15.1±1.3) d,均优于分期组的(5.6±1.3)万元、(28.7±2.5) d,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 对于双侧全髋关节置换术病人,同期手术与分期手术治疗效果无明显差异,但同期手术可以明显降低病人住院费用、住院时间,减轻病人负担。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the clinical effects of the simultaneous surgery vs. staged surgery in patients with total hip replacement. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing bilateral total hip arthroplasty in our hospital from October 2009 to June 2015 were collected. The therapeutic effects of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. According to the choice of different surgical methods, patients were divided into the simultaneous total hip replacement (simultaneous group) and the staged total hip replacement (staging group). The operative time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, blood transfusion, hospitalization expenses, hospital stay, Harris score before and after operation and postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the operative time (t=1.036, P=0.385), total amount of bleeding (t=0.968, P=0.572), blood transfusion (t=1.102, P=0.359) and Harris score (t=1.436, P=0.106; t=1.451, P=0.928) between two groups. The hospitalization expenses (t=3.857, P=0.015) were decreased, and hospital stay (t=3.996, P=0.012) was shortened in simultaneous group as compared with those in staging group. Conclusion There are no significant difference in the curative effects between the simultaneous and staging total hip replacement, but the simultaneous total hip replacement can significantly reduce the cost of hospitalization, and shorten hospital stay.
查看全文   下载PDF阅读器
关闭