文章摘要
张望,彭松林,镇万新,等.无体模法定量CT测量腰椎骨密度的可信度及可重复性研究.骨科,2016,7(6): 390-393.
无体模法定量CT测量腰椎骨密度的可信度及可重复性研究
Reproducibility of measurement of lumbar vertabal bone mineral density using quantitative CT without external reference phantom
投稿时间:2016-04-11  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8573.2016.06.002
中文关键词: 骨密度  定量CT  可信度  可重复性
英文关键词: Bone mineral density  Quantitative CT  Reliability  Reproducibility
基金项目:深圳市科技计划项目(GJHZ20140416123146582)
作者单位E-mail
张望 518020 广东深圳暨南大学第二临床医学院 深圳市人民医院脊柱外科  
彭松林 518020 广东深圳暨南大学第二临床医学院 深圳市人民医院脊柱外科  
镇万新 518020 广东深圳暨南大学第二临床医学院 深圳市人民医院脊柱外科 13802213788@163.com 
罗常 518020 广东深圳暨南大学第二临床医学院 深圳市人民医院脊柱外科  
摘要点击次数: 4982
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 评价无体模法定量CT(quantitative computed tomography, QCT)测量腰椎骨密度(bone mineral density, BMD; QCT-BMD)的同一位测量者内和3位测量者间BMD测量值的一致性和可重复性。方法 将31例患者的腰椎螺旋CT扫描数据传输至工作站进行BMD测量。由3位经过培训的脊柱外科医生(分别为测量者A、B、C)独立进行腰椎QCT-BMD测量,每位测量者对患者均测量2次。同一位测量者的2次测量和3位测量者间BMD测量值的差异用重复测量的方差分析比较,一致性分析用组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)描述。3位测量者间BMD测量值的可靠性分析用Cronbach’s α系数描述。结果 测量者A的2次腰椎BMD测量值分别为(67.14±26.71) mg/cc、(66.37±26.69) mg/cc,差值率为4.22%±2.55%(P=0.12, ICC=0.995);测量者B的2次腰椎BMD测量值分别为(68.89±29.37) mg/cc、(68.54±28.98) mg/cc,差值率为5.08%±3.83%(P=0.56, ICC=0.994);测量者C的2次腰椎BMD测量值分别为(69.31±26.72) mg/cc、(69.83±27.90) mg/cc,差值率为4.16%±3.03%(P=0.31, ICC=0.995)。3位测量者所测量的腰椎BMD平均值分别为(66.76±26.66) mg/cc、(68.71±29.13) mg/cc、(69.57±27.28) mg/cc(P=0.15, ICC=0.957, Cronbach’s α系数=0.985)。结论 无体模法QCT测量腰椎BMD具有较高的一致性和可重复性。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the intra- and inter-observer consistency and reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) in lumbar vertebrae measured by quantitative CT without external reference phantom. Methods The CT data of 31 cases were transferred to a work station to measure lumbar BMDs. The BMDs were measured by three trained spine surgeons. Each observer performed the measurements of all subjects twice. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability was calculated using analysis of variance of the repeatedly measured results. The consistency was analyzed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Reliability analysis in inter-observer was performed with Cronbach’s α coefficient. Results Data measured by Observer A were (67.14±26.71) mg/cc and (66.37±26.69) mg/cc [difference: (4.22±2.55) %, P=0.12, ICC=0.995], Observer B (68.89±29.37) mg/cc and (68.54±28.98) mg/cc [difference: (5.08±3.83) %, P=0.56, ICC=0.994], Observer C (69.31±26.72) mg/cc and (69.83±27.90) mg/cc [difference: (4.16±3.03) %, P=0.31, ICC=0.995], respectively. The mean lumbar BMDs by the three observers were (66.76±26.66), (68.71±29.13) and (69.57±27.28) mg/cc, respectively (P=0.15, ICC=0.957, Cronbach’s α coefficient=0.985). Conclusion High reproducibility and consistency in the measurement of lumbar BMD can be achieved with quantitative CT without external reference phantom.
查看全文   下载PDF阅读器
关闭